Overview
Not having to do specifically with the design of the website, image
optimization is often overlooked by web designers. However, optimized
images are essential for the success of a website, especially if images
play a large role in the site.
What is image optimization?
Image optimization is using the most compressed (smallest file size)
yet visually acceptable image in the proper file format for the specific
role of the image.
Why
is Image Optimization needed?
There are two immediately prevalent reasons for image optimization:
download time and bandwidth used. These may seem interrelated, but they
are important for different reasons. Hardware storage space is a third
reason that many only really apply in some cases.
Download time, though not as important as it was in the days of the
14.4k or 28.8k modem, is still a major factor in a sites success. A
user made to wait is a user more likely to hit the back button on the
website, or click on content that’s loads first instead of waiting
for the entire page to load. Losing customers to a page that take 10
seconds to load is unacceptable. Though you may have a fast internet
connection, others do not necessarily have these pleasantries, and there
are certainly a significant number of dial up users on the internet
and these users actually make up the majority in many developing countries.
Bandwidth is the hidden killer of the high traffic site. Plain and
simple, bandwidth costs money, and not optimizing images wastes precious
bandwidth that will end up costing you money, customers, or both. Most
mainstream hosting plans have bandwidth caps that require extra payment
for additional bandwidth if you go over your allotted bandwidth. The
problem is that you may not be reachable when this happens and your
site could be down until you pay additional funds or the bandwidth accrual
period starts over again.
Now consider a large site that uses images primarily as its content.
What if all the images on Flickr.com were not optimized. What if they
were twice the file size compared to what they could be? For a site
this large, not optimizing images has a serious impact on the infrastructure
of the site. You need twice the data center storage capacity, electricity,
data center engineers, part supply, and twice as much floor space to
house your servers. Not optimizing images on a scale this large could
mean thousands or millions of dollars of unecessary costs. You better
believe Flickr.com has thought about it, and probably has some very
advanced image resizing scripts in place. |
Can You Tell the Difference?

Above: Unoptimized .jpg Image - 36.2 kb

Above: Optimized .jpg Image - 7.5 kb
Photoshop - Saved For Web, 50 Quality

Above: Unoptimized .gif - 7.3 kb

Above: Optimized .gif - 3.9 kb
Photoshop
- 32 colors, Perceptual color algorithm
|
How
do I Optimize my Images?
Manual
image optimization is an easy process and not something that you should
have to go out of your way to do. First of all, you should be tinkering
with all your images in Adobe Photoshop. Other programs, despite promise,
are not on the same level as Photoshop. After you have manipulated your
image to the correct appearance and canvas size for the job, you need
to use the “Save for Web” command from
the file menu. This will allow you exercise fine-grained control over
the image and its file size.
The first thing to do is select a format for the job. A rule of thumb:
if your image is similar to a photograph (something with thousands or
even millions of colors), you should be using a .jpg format. If your
image is more similar to a graphic (think an illustration, or something
that has less than 300 colors), you should be using a .gif or .png format.
Many sites have jpegs when they should be using gifs or pngs. When in
doubt, trust your eyes and toggle back and forth between jpg and gif.
Make sure you look for distortion around sharp edges in .jpgs as a sign
of poor quality.
Jpeg graphic (.jpg) sizes are determined by the image canvas size and
the quality of the image. The quality is a factor between 1 and 100,
with 100 being the highest quality, that determines how much compression
is applied to the image. Sometimes, you will see this quality rating
in the range of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest quality. Though it
depends on the particular use of the image, most jpgs look best and
are most efficient between 50-70 quality. 50 being the lower range for
less important pictures, and 70 being the highest for larger, more important
pictures, like a title graphic or headshot of an important person.
The size of gif and png graphics is determined by the canvas size (though
to a lesser extent than jpgs) and the number of colors in the optimized
image. Using an efficient algorithm, Photoshop can break your graphic
into preset intervals of 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 colors or
even odd numbers in between. Most graphics and logos don’t need
256 colors to look good, and may even look good with as little as 32
or 16 colors. If in doubt, toggle the number of colors to 8 and work
upwards until you find a setting with acceptable appearance. The difference
between png and gif images is subtle; Depending on the graphic, either
one could look the best with the smallest file size. For larger graphics,
png seems to win the contest versus the older gif format. Pick one format
and be consistent with it throughout your site.
Large
Scale Optimization
One of the many benefits of PHP is its image handling packages GD and
GD2. Built into the latest versions of PHP, GD and GD2 allow for instant
image resizing and manipulation on the server before the image is sent
to the client. Bandwidth saved! Combined with the PHP's filesystem functions,
GD allows you to permanently resize images on your server. Have a site
where people upload there own pictures to go with their user profile?
After the user uploads the image, set the desired quality and image
size using PHP before saving the image to disk.
For details, read: PHP
Image Optimization |